🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 925+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Duck Shape Plush Bag

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.7 out of 5(925 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$20
$33.33
Sale
βœ“ complimentary shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Duck Shape Plush Bag with interchangeable handkerchiefs colors Brand latest. See Photo for Details

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Duck Shape Plush Bag

Duck Shape Plush Bag with interchangeable handkerchiefs colors Brand just-arrived. See Photo for Details

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2405871

Category: Vintage > Antiques > Bags & Purses

Original Price:$33.33 USD

Sale Price:$20 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4365 reviews
TM​
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional
No issues so far with the Duck Shape Plush Bag.
17 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
For the price, the Duck Shape Plush Bag works well enough and it’s fine overall.
42 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
foremost Duck Shape Plush Bag ever
Honestly, it works fine and it’s fine overall.
29 people found this helpful​
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
From my experience, it feels solid enough so it’s acceptable.
7 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
So far, it feels solid enough which is good enough.
47 people found this helpful