🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 264+ reviews
Otherβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Littmann stethoscope traditional iii

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(264 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$45
$75
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

In good used condition. Light wear

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Littmann stethoscope retro iii

In good used condition. Light wear

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Other products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2313441

Category: Other > Daily & Travel Items > Medical Supplies & Equipment

Original Price:$75 USD

Sale Price:$45 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4833 reviews
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
exceptional choice
After assorted use, the Littmann stethoscope retro iii works fine so it’s acceptable.
19 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
To be fair, the Littmann stethoscope enduring iii works fine and it works for me.
10 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So glad I bought this
To be fair, the Littmann stethoscope iconic iii is practical so it’s acceptable.
33 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent quality
The Littmann stethoscope timeless iii does its job well enough.
21 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
In daily use, the Littmann stethoscope traditional iii performs as expected so it’s acceptable.
4 people found this helpful