🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 720+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(720 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
βœ“ complimentary shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

MUSI marked large ornate shoe clips.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt dispatch

↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips

MUSI marked large ornate shoe clips.

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2056528

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Other

Original Price:$25 USD

Sale Price:$15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5927 reviews
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 days ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
splendid Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips!
For the price, it is practical so it’s acceptable. distribution was normal.
22 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely faultless
To be fair, it works well enough and it meets expectations. Packaging was uncomplicated.
9 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore it!
The Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips arrived in good shape and works well.
47 people found this helpful​
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
premier purchase ever
So far, the Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips works as described so I’m okay with it.
29 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
highly satisfied
The Vintage 1960s MUSI shoe clips doesn’t feel fragile, which is good.
49 people found this helpful