๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.4/5 from 747+ reviews
Beautyโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Beekman 1802 lavender bundle

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.4 out of 5(747 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$23
$38.33
Sale
โœ“ complimentary shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Brand new2 hand creams2 bars of soap

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
rapid fulfillment
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Beekman 1802 lavender bundle

Brand newly-released
2 hand creams
2 bars of soap

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1145500

Category: Beauty > Bath & Body > Sets

Original Price:$38.33 USD

Sale Price:$23 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ at no charge fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.4
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 5431 reviews
NP​
Nathan Phillips โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Albuquerque, NM
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So glad I bought this
After a few days, the Beekman 1802 lavender bundle works well enough which feels reasonable.
19 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So glad I bought this
For the price, the Beekman 1802 lavender bundle is uncomplicated to use so no complaints.
29 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Seattle, WA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
first-rate
Nice design and good usability Beekman 1802 lavender bundle.
15 people found this helpful​
AW
Ashley White โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Phoenix, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
splendid find!
The Beekman 1802 lavender bundle feels normal, not low quality.
18 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท San Jose, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Outstanding!
To be fair, the Beekman 1802 lavender bundle is effortless to use which is good enough.
47 people found this helpful