🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 955+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(955 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13
$21.67
Sale
βœ“ complimentary shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

None

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt dispatch
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings

None

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1004982

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price:$21.67 USD

Sale Price:$13 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3741 reviews
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Super happy
Happy with the performance of Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings.
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding for my needs
The Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings looks basic, but functionally it’s fine.
33 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 day ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings!
Personally, the Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings does its job and it meets expectations.
45 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure it!
So far, the Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings fits my needs so it’s acceptable.
40 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
For the price, the Retro Cross Copper Inlay Rhinestones Rings is practical which is good enough. Nothing fancy.
38 people found this helpful