๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 443+ reviews
Menโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

RUGBY CITADEL - Polo shirt

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.8 out of 5(443 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$45
$75
Sale
โœ“ complimentary shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Collar : Polo shirtArticle number : TI122P01W-M11

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt dispatch
โ†ฉ๏ธ
uncomplicated Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

RUGBY CITADEL - Polo shirt

Collar : Polo shirt
Article number : TI122P01W-M11

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Men products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 856807

Category: Men > Clothing > T-shirts & Polos

Original Price:$75 USD

Sale Price:$45 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3350 reviews
AW
Ashley White โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Nashville, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
terrific investment
I donโ€™t regret buying the RUGBY CITADEL - Polo shirt.
4 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Raleigh, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
really happy
After a few days, the RUGBY CITADEL - Polo shirt works well enough and it works for me.
44 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Chicago, IL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Couldn't be happier
Personally, the RUGBY CITADEL - Polo shirt works well enough and it works for me.
44 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Atlanta, GA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Worth every penny
Solid performance from the RUGBY CITADEL - Polo shirt.
40 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Pittsburgh, PA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
treasure this RUGBY CITADEL - Polo shirt!
From my experience, the RUGBY CITADEL - Polo shirt fits my needs which is good enough. Works fine so far.
20 people found this helpful