๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.4/5 from 656+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

Vintage Jewelry Earrings Oval 80s 90s y2k

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.4 out of 5(656 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6​
$10
Sale
โœ“ complimentary shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Vintage Jewelry Earrings Oval 80s 90s y2k

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt dispatch
โ†ฉ๏ธ
uncomplicated Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Jewelry Earrings Oval 80s 90s y2k

Vintage Jewelry Earrings Oval 80s 90s y2k

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 703653

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Earrings

Original Price:$10 USD

Sale Price:$6 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.4
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 4181 reviews
AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท San Francisco, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
So happy with this
After several use, it is practical which feels reasonable. Packaging was plain.
JM
Jessica Moore โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Boston, MA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
flawless in every way
From my experience, it fits my needs so Iโ€™m okay with it. Nothing fancy.
37 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Fort Worth, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Really splendid
The Vintage Jewelry Earrings Oval 80s 90s y2k looks basic but works well.
34 people found this helpful

JM
Jessica Moore โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Los Angeles, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Absolutely faultless
At first, it is straightforward to use which feels reasonable.
10 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago ยท Miami, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exactly what I needed
Honestly, the Vintage Jewelry Earrings Oval 80s 90s y2k performs as expected which is good enough.
13 people found this helpful